Legal Opinion
Courtenay Communications Corporation v. Patricia Hall and Hallmark Capital Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 24, 2003No. Docket 01-9056PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
F.I. PARKER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, Courtenay Communications Corporation (“CCC”) appeals from • the June 9, 2001 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Lawrence M. McKenna, Judge), granting the motion of defendants-appellees, Patricia M. Hall and Hallmark Capital Corporation (collectively, “Hall”) to dismiss CCC’s complaint which alleged various violations of the Lanham Act § 43(a), 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and state law claims of libel per se, breach of fiduciary duty and conversion. See Courtenay Communications Corp. v. Hall, No. 01 CIV.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Star Industries, Inc. v. Bacardi & Company Limited, Bacardi U.S.A., and Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Famous Horse Inc. v. 5th Ave. Photo Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Vox Amplification Ltd. v. MeussdorfferDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Merck & Co. v. Mediplan Health Consulting, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Donchez v. Coors Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.