Legal Opinion
Claim of Passarelli v. Columbia Engineering & Contracting Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 3, 1936PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.
The Columbia Engineering and Contracting Co., Inc., had a general contract for the construction of the White Plains-Tarrytown road. The Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company insured it against Eability under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 67). The pohcy covered construction but excluded excavation and other dangerous and hazardous work. Emil Eklund had a subcontract with the Columbia Company “ for lifting and hauling of the rock and dirt.” Eklund had insurance with the Southern Surety Company, which insurance was subsequently reinsured by the Home Indemnity Company. This…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clark v. Monarch Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Monello v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Matter of Arner v. Manhattan Spring Couch Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Claim of Teufel v. Lido Club Hotel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Matter of Ciappa v. RosenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
3Cited by12 opinions
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Claim of Otterbein v. Babor & Comeau Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Sweezey v. Arc Electrical Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Claim of Cruz v. New Millennium Construction & Restoration Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- T. H. Mastin & Co. v. RussellMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.