Legal Opinion

Sweezey v. Arc Electrical Construction Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1946PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConway, J.

This is an appeal by permission of the Appellate Division from an order of that court affirming an order of the Special Term denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the “ second, separate and complete defense ” contained in defendant’s amended answer. The Appellate Division certified the following question: “ Is the second affirmative defense sufficient in law? ” „

It appears from the complaint that defendant was engaged as a general contractor in connection with certain electrical work, including work in tunnels, manholes and service connections, being performed at the new State hospital…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. Monarch Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Claim of Passarelli v. Columbia Engineering & Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Casey v. ShaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Matter of Anttonen v. Laakso Builders, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Meiggs v. Associated Builders, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Schulte v. American Box Board Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Gambella v. John A. Johnson & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  5. Dagenhardt v. Special Machine & Engineering, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API