Legal Opinion
Monello v. Klein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 3, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtH. T. Kellogg, J.
The claimant sustained an accidental injury, arising out of and in the course of his employment, while in the employ of Vito Aparo. Vito Aparo was a subcontractor for Sam Klein. The claimant was injured while engaged in hazardous work covered by the contract between Aparo and Klein. It is provided in section 56 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law: “ A contractor, the subject of whose contract is, involves or includes a hazardous employment, who subcontracts all or any part of such contract shall be hable for and shall pay compensation to any employee injured whose injury arises out of and in…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Clark v. Monarch Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Claim of Passarelli v. Columbia Engineering & Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Casey v. ShaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Sweezey v. Arc Electrical Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Thomas Bros. Lumber Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942