Legal Opinion

T. H. Mastin & Co. v. Russell

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1952No. 38419PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberds, P. J.

The main question for determination in this case is whether appellant was a compensation insurer for the benefit of Noah Bussell at the time of his death May 26, 1951, as an employee of Bube Morris. The attorney-referee, the full commission and the circuit court held that appellant was such an insurer, and this appeal is from those holdings. The question arises under these circumstances:

Morris was operating a sawmill. Bussell was his employee. Bussell came to- his death as a result of an accident in the line of duty. Beginning" January 24, 1950, appellant issued to Morris five successive…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Otterbein v. Babor & Comeau Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Claim of Passarelli v. Columbia Engineering & Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. White v. Great American Insurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1972
  2. Arender v. National Sales, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Southeastern Colorado Homeless Center v. WestColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Cooper v. Marathon Freight Lines, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Ives v. Sunfish Sign Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API