Legal Opinion
Claim of Otterbein v. Babor & Comeau Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 24, 1936PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, J.
The sole question here involved is whether the respondent, Massachusetts Bonding Company, with the Glens Falls Indemnity Company, appellant, should be held jointly hable for payment of the award.
The respondent Massachusetts Bonding Company issued a standard New York State compensation policy to the employer for the calendar year from January 1,1934, to January 1, 1935. Under date of April 19, 1934, the Massachusetts Bonding Company requested the employer to seek workmen’s compensation insurance in some other company. On April 26, 1934, the employer notified the Massachusetts Bonding Company…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Claim of Passarelli v. Columbia Engineering & Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Matter of Arner v. Manhattan Spring Couch Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
3Cited by31 opinions
- Teeter v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Reserve Insurance v. DuckettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Government Employees Insurance v. MizellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Ohran v. National Automobile Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.