APF Electronics Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Maletz, Judge:
This case involves the proper tariff classification of merchandise invoiced as “T.V. Games” that was exported from Japan aDd entered at the port of Chicago in 1976. The merchandise was classified by Customs under item 735.20 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), as modified by T.D. 68-9, as game *26equipment not specially provided íor and assessed duty at the rate of 10 percent ad valorem.
Plaintiff's principal claim is that the merchandise is properly classifiable under item 734.20, TSUS, as modified by T.D. 68-9, as game machines, dutiable at the rate of 5.5 percent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- United States v. Janson Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Westinghouse Electric International Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Lanvin Parfums, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Intel Singapore, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995