Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Fort

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey

Decided August 2, 1911PublishedCited by 15 opinions

In Equity. Bill by Harry Hubbard and another, as receivers of the Hudson County Water Company, against John Franklin Fort and others.

1Opinion of the Court

RELESTAB, District Judge.

The bill is filedl by the receivers of the Hudson County Water Company, a New Jersey corporation (hereinafter called the Water Company), and attacks the constitutionality of certain acts of the New Jersey legislature, and seeks to have the defendants, certain state officers, enjoined from enforcing such acts, and from interfering with complainants in carrying out certain contracts and engaging in interstate commerce in water.

The bill, so far as is necessary for present consideration, alleges, in *989substance: The incorporation of such Water Company by the state of New…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Stockton v. Baltimore & N. Y. R.United States Circuit Court · 1887
  3. United States v. Bellingham Bay Boom Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Cobb v. Commissioners of Lincoln ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Kansas Natural Gas Co. v. HaskellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Oklahoma · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Company v. United States of America, and Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  2. Sierra Club v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. Sierra Club v. MortonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1975
  4. Strandholm v. BarbeyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Attorney General Ex Rel. State Banking Commissioner v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API