Legal Opinion
Attorney General Ex Rel. State Banking Commissioner v. Michigan National Bank
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 1941No. Docket No. 66, Calendar No. 41,537PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChandler, J.
Quo warranto proceedings were instituted by the attorney general upon the relation of the commissioner of banking of the State of Michigan to inquire by what warrant the Michigan National Bank, a banking association organized under the laws of the United States with sole au thority to carry on operations of discount and deposit in the city of Lansing, exercises the privilege of operating branches in other cities and to act in fiduciary capacities in each of said cities contrary to the laws of the State of Michigan.
The answer of defendant to the information so filed establishes the following…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Weston and Others v. the City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. DearingSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commercial State Bank of Roseville v. GidneyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1959
- First National Bank of Fair-Banks v. William B. Camp, Comptroller of the Currency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- State of South Dakota v. National Bank of South DakotaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1963
- Lau v. LauMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- AMERICAN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. SaxonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.