Kansas Natural Gas Co. v. Haskell
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Oklahoma
In Equity. On motions for preliminary injunctions and demurrers to bills. Bills by the Marnet Mining Company, by A. W. Lewis, and by O. A. Bleakley against the same defendants are also governed by the opinion reported herewith.
1Opinion of the Court
POLLOCK and CAMPBELL,
District Judges. The scope of each of the foregoing bills being identical, and the object and purpose sought to be accomplished thereby being the same, the cases will be considered together, as they have been argued, briefed, and submitted for decision in that manner. The facts necessary to a decision of the questions involved may be stated, as follows:
At its regular 1907 session the Legislature of this state passed an act, the same being chapter 67, p. 586, of the Laws for the Year 1907, which provides as follows:
“Chapter 67.
“Pipe Lines. Regulating Gas and Oil Pipe Lines.
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gas Products Co. v. RankinMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Erie City v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- In Re Skelton Lead & Zinc Co.'s Gross Production Tax for 1919Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Dies v. Bank of Commerce of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Motoramp Garage Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1925
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.