Legal Opinion

Norfolk & Western Company v. United States of America, and Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 21, 1980No. 78-3271PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is taken from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, the Honorable John M. Manos presiding, dismissing Norfolk & Western Railway Company’s complaint alleging 1) that Dunbar had breached provisions of the construction contract of which Norfolk & Western was an intended beneficiary; 2) that the United States and Dunbar were negligent in failing to investigate the capacity of the dock to support the load and therefore caused the dock to collapse; and 3) that the defendants were required by the Rivers and Harbors Act of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. United States v. Republic Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Waterman S. S. Corp. v. United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Brian Midkiff Monica Midkiff v. Adams County Regional Water DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. Hill v. Sonitrol of Southwestern Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Evans v. Multicon Construction Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  4. Trinova Corp. v. Pilkington Bros., P.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WEST INDIES TRANSPORT, INC.; WIT EQUIPMENT CO., INC.; And W. JAMES OELSNER, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API