Di Maggio v. Lindsay
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtIrving H. Saypol, J.
Once again, a recurrent sore on the municipal escutcheon, in the past resisted by government, although with equivocal, sometimes reluctant opposition, but now twisted finally to official yielding and submission. The theme is abandonment of the rule of law for submission to expediency — which no court can condone, let alone accept.
The petitioner Di Maggio sues for an order (CPLR art. 78, §§ 7801, 7803, subd. 2) against the City of New York: “ restrain*210ing, prohibiting and enjoining the respondents John V. Lindsay, Mayor * * *, Mario Procaccino, Comptroller * * *, Mitchell Ginsberg, Commissioner…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of Andresen v. RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- New York Transit Authority v. LoosNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Welling v. FullenNew York Supreme Court · 1937
- Pruzan v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Weinstein v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tuck v. HeckscherNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Di Maggio v. LindsayNew York Supreme Court · 1967