Legal Opinion

Weinstein v. New York City Transit Authority

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1966PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIrving H. Saypol, J.

This application (CPLR, art. 78) was heard by the court during the recent strike of New York City Transit Authority (Authority) employees. Transportation facilities came to a halt New Year’s morning January 1, 1966. Operations resumed after January 13. Petitioner asks for an order restraining, prohibiting and enjoining as illegal the offering or paying by the respondents to the strikers of any amount in excess of their compensation in effect prior to the strike on January 1, 1966, for at least three years after resumption of their re-employments (Civil Service Law, § 108 — the Condon-Wadlin…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Adler v. Board of Ed. of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Railway Mail Assn. v. CorsiSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Hamm v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Matter of Andresen v. RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Di Maggio v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Jamur Productions Corp. v. QuillNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Long Island Signal Corp. v. County of NassauNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Blaikie v. LindsayNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Di Maggio v. LindsayNew York Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API