Legal Opinion

Di Maggio v. Lindsay

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1967PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtIrviug H. Saypol, J.

Motion by the respondents for an order granting reargument and thereupon vacating the prior judgment entered the 27th of March 1967, is granted. The decision of March 13, 1967 (53 Misc 2d 209) is amended to reflect the subsequent enactment on April 21, 1967 of chapters 394 (New York City — Department of Welfare) and 395 (New York City — Housing Authority) of the Laws of 1967. The effect of the new legislation is to masculate in application here the mandatory operation of the enforcement provisions of the Condon-Wadlin Law (Civil Service Law, § 108) and permit an exculpatory course, permissive…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Kahn (National City Bank)New York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Weinstein v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Blaikie v. LindsayNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Di Maggio v. LindsayNew York Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ruben v. American & Foreign InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API