Legal Opinion
New York Transit Authority v. Loos
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 1956PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVincent A. Lupiano, J.
The plaintiff, New York City Transit Authority, sues for an injunction restraining the defendant Motormen’s Benevolent Association, Inc. and the individual defendants, who are either officers, committeemen or members *735of the association, as well as all other persons employed by the plaintiff under the title “ motorman ”, from striking or instigating, promoting or carrying on a strike or other work stoppage. It has moved for an injunction pendente lite. The defendants have cross moved for an order dismissing the complaint for insufficiency on its face, and for other forms of relief; among other…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Norwalk Teachers' Ass'n v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Building & Construction Trades CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Jewish Hospital v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- City of Detroit v. Division 26 of the Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Crosland v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Rankin v. ShankerNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Di Maggio v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Delaware River & Bay Authority v. International Organization of Masters, Mates & PilotsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.