Legal Opinion
Pruzan v. Board of Education
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 12, 1960PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.
Motion by defendant pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice to dismiss complaint for insufficiency and for judgment pursuant to rules 112 and 113 of the Buies of Civil Practice. Plaintiffs, by cross motion, seek judgment pursuant to rules 112 and 113 of the Buies of Civil Practice.
The complaint under attack seeks a declaratory judgment to the effect that section 108 of the Civil Service Law (Condon-Wadlin Act), insofar as it affects plaintiffs’ proposed course of conduct hereinafter set forth, is unconstitutional. By leave of the court, briefs as amici curice have…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Adler v. Board of Ed. of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of New York v. De LuryNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Pinellas Cty. C. Teachrs. Ass'n v. Bd. of Public Instr. of Pinellas Cty.Supreme Court of Florida · 1968
- Weinstein v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Blaikie v. LindsayNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- City of New York v. Social Service Employees UnionNew York Supreme Court · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.