Legal Opinion

State v. Tvedt

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 2005No. 73944-7PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Petitioner Ronald Tvedt contends that his convictions on four counts of first degree robbery violate the state and federal constitutional proscriptions against double jeopardy. This challenge requires this court to decide what constitutes the unit of prosecution for robbery. We conclude that the unit of prosecution for robbery is each taking of personal property from a person or from his or her presence against the person’s will through the use or threat of force, violence, or injury to a person or property, regardless of the number of items taken. A single taking can result in a…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. State v. CalleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. RupeWashington Supreme Court · 1984

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. State v. SutherbyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. SutherbyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. KierWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. TvedtWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. OseWashington Supreme Court · 2005

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API