Legal Opinion

State v. Kier

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 2008No. 81030-3PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

¶1 In State v. Freeman, 153 Wn.2d 765, 108 P.3d 753 (2005), we recognized that when an assault *802elevates a robbery to first degree, generally the two offenses are the same for double jeopardy purposes. We refused to adopt a per se rule, however, underscoring the need to take a “hard look at each case.” Id. at 774. In this case, Herbert John Kier was convicted of first degree robbery and second degree assault, arising out of a carjacking incident. While he maintains that the assault conviction merges with the robbery conviction under our holding in Freeman, the State urges us to reconsider our…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of OrangeWashington Supreme Court · 2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. MutchWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. BarberWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. KelleyWashington Supreme Court · 2010

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API