State v. Kier
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
¶1 In State v. Freeman, 153 Wn.2d 765, 108 P.3d 753 (2005), we recognized that when an assault *802elevates a robbery to first degree, generally the two offenses are the same for double jeopardy purposes. We refused to adopt a per se rule, however, underscoring the need to take a “hard look at each case.” Id. at 774. In this case, Herbert John Kier was convicted of first degree robbery and second degree assault, arising out of a carjacking incident. While he maintains that the assault conviction merges with the robbery conviction under our holding in Freeman, the State urges us to reconsider our…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Personal Restraint of OrangeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. MutchWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. BarberWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. KelleyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.