Legal Opinion

State v. Calle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1995No. 61536-5PublishedCited by 266 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

At issue in this case is whether the Defendant’s convictions for first degree incest and second degree rape violate the Fifth Amendment’s protection against double jeopardy because they arose from a single act of intercourse.

Facts

James Calle, hereafter referred to as the Defendant, was originally charged with committing second degree rape by forcibly engaging in sexual intercourse with "K” on February 14, 1992. The prosecutor subsequently charged the Defendant with an additional count of first degree incest based on the same incident. The amended information alleged that "K” is the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by266 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of OrangeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 1999

261 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API