Legal Opinion

Natale v. Kisling

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 9, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

764 A.2d 463 (2001)

336 N.J. Super. 198

Marie R. NATALE and Gregory Natale, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Michele H. KISLING and GECAL, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 27, 2000.

Decided January 9, 2001.

George A. Mauro, Jr., Somerville, argued the cause for appellants (Mauro, Savo, Camerino & Grant, attorneys; Mr. Mauro, on the brief).

John T. Bazzurro, Red Bank, argued the cause for respondents (Wolff, Helies, Duggan, Spaeth & Lucas, attorneys; Mr. Bazzurro on the brief).

Before NEWMAN and WELLS.

This opinion of the court was delivered by WELLS,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Oswin v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Brooks v. OdomSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  3. Phillips v. PhillipsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  4. Cineas v. MammoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  5. Dabal v. SodoraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Rogozinski v. TursNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  3. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API