Legal Opinion

DiProspero v. Penn

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 14, 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

874 A.2d 1039 (2005)

183 N.J. 477

Christina DiPROSPERO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Barbara J. PENN and Martha M. Turner, Defendants Respondents, and

John Doe(s), jointly, severally and/or in the alternative, Defendant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 29, 2004.

Decided June 14, 2005.

Franklin P. Solomon, New York City argued the cause for appellant (Weitz & Luxenberg, attorneys).

Susan Stryker, Trenton argued the cause for respondents (Sterns & Weinroth, attorneys; Ms. Stryker and Mitchell A. Livingston, on the brief).

Cynthia M. Craig, Chatham argued the cause for amicus curiae Trial Attorneys…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Albin; Concurrence.

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  5. Pommells v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API