Legal Opinion

Dabal v. Sodora

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 28, 1992PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

260 N.J. Super. 397 (1992)

616 A.2d 1297

ELIZABETH A. DABAL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

LEONARD SODORA, JR., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 15, 1992.

Decided September 28, 1992.

Before Judges PRESSLER and KESTIN.

Walter L. Faust argued the cause for appellant (Kenneth D. Iulo, attorney; Mr. Faust, on the brief).

Rose A. Peligri argued the cause for respondent (Harwood Lloyd, attorney; Brian C. Gallagher, of counsel; Ms. Peligri, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

This is a so-called verbal threshold case in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oswin v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Oswin v. ShawNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  3. Brown v. PuenteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brooks v. OdomSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. Polk v. DaconceicaoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  3. James v. TorresNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  4. Phillips v. PhillipsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  5. Puso v. KenyonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API