Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Odom

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 15, 1997PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

POLLOCK, J.

This appeal presents two issues. The first issue is what constitutes a “permanent loss of a bodily function” under the New Jersey Tort Claims Act (“The Act” or “The Tort Claims Act”), N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d). Second, we must decide whether plaintiff, Bertha Brooks (“plaintiff”), may recover from defendants Willie Mae Odom and New Jersey Transit Corporation (“New Jersey Transit”) (jointly described as “defendants”) her co-payments and deductible amounts under her health insurance policy.

The Law Division granted summary judgment for defendants. It…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  3. Oswin v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  4. Dairy Stores, Inc. v. Sentinel Publishing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. State v. MaddenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Franklin Tower One, L.L.C. v. N.M.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. Lowe v. ZarghamiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. Gilhooley v. County of UnionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  4. Alston v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  5. Fluehr v. City of Cape MaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API