Lau v. Scribner
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne; Bridgman, J., presiding. Bill by Z. Lau against Moses Scribner and others to set aside the foreclosure of a mortgage. From a decree dismissing the bill plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The bill of complaint in this cause was filed to set aside a statutory foreclosure sale by advertisement of certain premises in the city of Detroit, and to redeem from the mortgage. It appears that on April 29, 1902, one Harry M. Lau and wife executed a mortgage upon the premises to Moses Scribner for $2,500, payable three years from date, with interest at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum, payable semiannually. Afterwards, and on August 29, 1906, the said Harry M. Lau and wife conveyed the premises to the plaintiff subject to the mortgage in question.
Though long past due, interest was paid…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lee v. ClaryMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Reading v. WatermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Bacon v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- McCardia v. BillingsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
- Martin v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Worthy v. World Wide Financial Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Oades v. Standard Sayings & Loan AssnMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Witter v. Bank of MilpitasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Peterson v. JacobsMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Moss v. KearyMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.