Legal Opinion
Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. Stageberg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 9, 1925No. 24,411PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
The issue is between the plaintiff bank and the Emerson-Brantingham Implement Company, intervener. The plaintiff claims to be the owner in fee of land in Pennington county free of encumbrances. The intervener claims a lien by virtue of a judgment against the defendant Stageberg. There were findings for the plaintiff and the intervener appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
In 1919 the plaintiff was the owner in fee of the land involved. Its legal title was subject to an outstanding equitable title under a contract of purchase afterward assigned to the defendant Stage-berg.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hook v. Northwest Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Martin v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Reynolds v. FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- School District No. 10 v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Fleming v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Butler v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Application of JuranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Mary Joyce Thomson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- McKenzie County v. CasadyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.