Legal Opinion
Lopp v. Lopp
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 26, 1961No. Civ. 25422PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBalthis, J.
Plaintiff obtained a writ of execution in the above action and the marshal levied upon certain property belonging to the defendant, to wit, a 1958 Ford pickup truck.
Defendant made and filed an affidavit claiming exemption which includes the following statement: “That affiant is in the business of mounting and dismounting retread tires for various used car lots and said truck is a tool or implement necessary to carry on his trade and is thereby exempt under Code of Civil Procedure section 690.4.”
Upon a motion made by plaintiff to determine this claim of exemption, the court sustained…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Security-First National Bank v. PiersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Conlin v. TraegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- In re WilderDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1915
- Peebler v. DanzigerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Twining v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
3Cited by10 opinions
- Heitkamp v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Seacord v. Commerce Bank of Blue Hills (In Re Seacord)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1980
- Lampley v. AlvaresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- First Hardin National Bank v. Damron (In Re Damron)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1980
- Sun Ltd. v. CaseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.