Legal Opinion
In re Wilder
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 4, 1915No. 8956PublishedCited by 7 opinions
_ In Bankruptcy. In the matter of William Wilder, bankrupt. On re-_ view of an order of the referee holding a taxicab not to be exempt.
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, District Judge.
The bankrupt claims as exempt a taxicab automobile, under the provisions of section 690 of the Code of Civil Procedure of California, which exempts:
“Two horses, two oxen, or two mules, and their harnesses, and one cart or wagon, one dray or truck, one coupe, one hack or carriage, for one or two horses, by the use of which a eartman, drayman, truckman, huckster, peddler, hackman, teamster or other laborer habitually earns his living.”
The bankrupt is a hackman. This taxicab does not fall within the literal terms of the section, and while those provisions are to be…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Medical Finance Assn. v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Lopp v. LoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Conlin v. TraegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Northern New York Trust Co. v. Bano, New York County Courts1934
- Young v. WrightIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.