Legal Opinion

Conlin v. Traeger

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 5, 1927No. Docket No. 5498PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.

This is an action brought by appellant, who is a physician practicing his profession at Long Beach, California, to recover damages against respondent, who, as sheriff, attached an automobile belonging to appellant. The only question presented is whether an automobile used by a physician in the legitimate practice of his profession is exempt from attachment or execution under section 690 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

It is alleged in the complaint that plaintiff is a physician, duly licensed to practice medicine and surgery in the state of California, and that on March…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lames v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Favers v. GlassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  3. Stanton v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Roberts v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Spangler v. CorlessUtah Supreme Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Medical Finance Assn. v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Lopp v. LoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Wade v. RathbunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. McMullen v. ShieldsMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. WatersAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API