Security-First National Bank v. Pierson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
Fourteen saddles, nineteen bridles, fifteen saddle blankets, three hackamores, and packing equipment, of a value less than $1,000, were seized from the possession of the defendant under a writ of execution to satisfy a deficiency judgment against him. The defendant moved to discharge said personal property from the levy and seizure on the ground that it was exempt from execution pursuant to the provisions of section 690, subdivision 3, of the Code of Civil Procedure. The motion was granted and the plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.
The only question to be determined is whether the trial court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re Estate of McManusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Pacific Bank v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Dillard v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Stanton v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Crown Laundry & Cleaning Co. v. CameronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wint v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Brethren Mutual InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Love v. MenickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Lopp v. LoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Love v. MenickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.