Legal Opinion

Peebler v. Danziger

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1951No. Civ. 18210PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

Plaintiffs obtained a money judgment against defendants, including defendant Hutchinson. An execution was issued and levied upon the latter’s tools and equipment consisting of three lawn mowers—one hand mower, a circular power mower, and a Gravely tractor mower—an iron bar, shovels, spades, picks and adze, and a grave lowering device. Defendant filed with the sheriff a claim that the property under levy consisted of “The tools or implements of a me chanic or artisan, necessary to carry on his trade,” and were exempt from execution as provided in section 690.4 of the Code of Civil Procedure.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Estate of McManusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. In re RobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lopp v. LoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Kono v. MeekerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Twining v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. In re SandersonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
  5. C.F. Nielsen, Inc. v. SternAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API