Legal Opinion
C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 6, 2013No. Civ. No. 13-923 (RHK/JSM)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This action arises out of Minnesota State Project No. 8214-114 (the “Project”) for the design and construction of the “approach” (described in more detail below) to the future bridge connecting Oak Park Heights, Minnesota, to St. Joseph, Wiscon*853sin, over the St. Croix River.1 Plaintiff C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. (“McCrossan”) submitted a proposal to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (“MNDOT”) to undertake the Project for approximately $52 million. MNDOT rejected the proposal and selected a different…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester, First Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Truenorth Cos., L.C. v. Trunorth Warranty Plans of N. Am., LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2018
- Carlson v. City of DuluthDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- A-1 National Fire Co. LLC v. Freedom Fire LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Abi v. BarrDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.