Legal Opinion
Carlson v. City of Duluth
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 18, 2013No. Civil No. 13-1831 (MJD/LIB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief Judge.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs objections to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated July 15, 2013. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b).
I. Summary of Decision
The City of Duluth recently enacted an ordinance that requires any person who engages in the business of operating a synthetic drug establishment, to first obtain a license for such establishment. Plaintiff claims that this ordinance is…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bryan C. Singer, Erika L. Nordyke, Beverly A. Van Dam, Joshua L. Dykstra, 3D Rentals, LLC, And DP Homes, LLC v. City of Orange City and Kurt FrederesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2024
- City of Duluth v. 120 East Superior Street, Duluth, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Purdy v. LeJeuneDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
- Thompson v. Lakeville Area SchoolsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
- United Natural Foods, Inc. v. Teamsters Local 120District Court, D. Minnesota · 2021