Kline v. Old Guard Insurance Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY BECK, J.:
¶ 1 In this declaratory judgment action, plaintiff-appellees Kenneth L. Kline and Edna C. Kline (the Klines) sought a declaration that they were entitled to underin-sured motorist (UIM) benefits under a motor vehicle insurance policy issued by defendant-appellant Old Guard Insurance Company (Old Guard), pursuant to Pennsylvania’s Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL), 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 1701-1799.7 (Purdon 1996). The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Klines in the amount of $300,000. Old Guard filed this timely appeal. Old Guard asserts the trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Winslow-Quattlebaum v. Maryland Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Lewis v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Salazar v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Donnelly v. BauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. DeMicheleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Smith v. Enterprise Leasing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Donohue v. State Farm Mutual Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2005
- JALLAD v. MADERADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.