Legal Opinion

Kline v. Old Guard Insurance Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 2003PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY BECK, J.:

¶ 1 In this declaratory judgment action, plaintiff-appellees Kenneth L. Kline and Edna C. Kline (the Klines) sought a declaration that they were entitled to underin-sured motorist (UIM) benefits under a motor vehicle insurance policy issued by defendant-appellant Old Guard Insurance Company (Old Guard), pursuant to Pennsylvania’s Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL), 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 1701-1799.7 (Purdon 1996). The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Klines in the amount of $300,000. Old Guard filed this timely appeal. Old Guard asserts the trial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Winslow-Quattlebaum v. Maryland Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Lewis v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Salazar v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Donnelly v. BauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jones v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. DeMicheleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Smith v. Enterprise Leasing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Donohue v. State Farm Mutual Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2005
  5. JALLAD v. MADERADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API