Legal Opinion
Donnelly v. Bauer
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 29, 1998No. 0033-0039 E.D. Appeal DktPublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CASTILLE, Justice.
The sole issue in these consolidated appeals is whether the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (“MVFRL”)1 requires that an individual, who applies for an original insurance policy after July 1, 1990, be provided with a specific form *600which contains premium information for both the full and limited tort options. While we find that the plain language of the MVFRL requires an individual purchasing an original insurance policy after July 1, 1990 to receive such premium information, we nevertheless affirm the order of the Superior Court because the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- E. J. McAleer & Co. v. Iceland Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Salazar v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Terminato v. Pennsylvania National InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Philadelphia Suburban Corp. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
3Cited by62 opinions
- Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. BuffettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Burstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Craley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Lewis v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.