Legal Opinion

Smith v. Enterprise Leasing Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

¶ 1 This is an appeal from the grant of partial summary judgment1 in favor of plaintiffs-appellees Sharmetha Smith and Vanessa Smith and against defendant-appellant Enterprise Leasing Company of Philadelphia, t/a Enterprise Rent-a-Car. The issue is whether Enterprise, a self-insured entity, must pay to the Smiths, renters of an Enterprise vehicle, uninsured motorist (UM) benefits pursuant to the terms of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL), 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 1701-1799.7 (Purdon 1996). The trial court held that Enterprise owed *752such coverage to the Smiths as a matter…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hackenberg v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Lange v. BurdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Nelson v. HeslinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Gutman v. Worldwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Kline v. Old Guard Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bielec, J. v. American International Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API