Zeigler v. Simplex Foundation Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 69, Jan. T., 1910, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1906, No. 4,857, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of Louisa Zeigler v. Simplex Foundation Company. Trespass to recover damages for death of plaintiff’s husband.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 69, Jan. T., 1910, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1906, No. 4,857, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of Louisa Zeigler v. Simplex Foundation Company. Trespass to recover damages for death of plaintiff’s husband. Before Ferguson, J. At the trial the court entered a compulsory nonsuit which it subsequently refused to take off, Ferguson, J., filing the following opinion: We have given careful consideration to the evidence in this case and are of opinion the motion to take off the nonsuit must be overruled. The deceased was killed by the falling of…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The judgment in this case is affirmed on the well-considered opinion of the court below in refusing to take off the nonsuit.
2Cited by11 opinions
- Murray v. SiegalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Reliance Universal, Inc. v. Ernest Renda Contracting Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Med-Mar, Inc. v. DILWORTHSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Roberts v. Pitt Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co. v. CannonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.