Roberts v. Pitt Publishing Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaefer,
All who have had to deal with this ease, counsel on both sides, trial judge and court in banc, treat it as one of difficulty in seeing that justice is done. To theirs we add our own sense of uncertainty in conclusion. It is a case in which, in order that the evidence be accurately weighed, strict rules must be followed and close reasoning applied.
The perplexity which confronts sureness of determination arises from the circumstance that plaintiff was in two automobile accidents on the same night, in both of which his head was injured. If his injuries can with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Howarth v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. RosenzweigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Eby v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Albert v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- John v. Reick-Mcjunkin Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Freedman v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Donaldson v. MaffucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. HellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Murray v. SiegalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Reliance Universal, Inc. v. Ernest Renda Contracting Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.