Legal Opinion

Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co. v. Cannon

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 27, 1924No. 3047PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

Cannon was a brakeman in a yard shifting crew of the defendant company at work in the Harrisburg yards. On the day in question it was desired to shift two shop cars from one part of the yard to another. These cars stood beyond and were attached to three Western Maryland battleship cars. To move the shop cars it was necessary to move the Western Maryland cars also, the purpose being, after the shop cars had been dropped, to return the Western Maryland cars to the same place. To effect this movement the engine, to which a car loaded with stone had been attached, backed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murray v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Schauffele v. Director General of RailroadsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
  3. Zeigler v. Simplex Foundation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Pennsylvania R. v. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
  5. Kozimko v. HinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Howe v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Brownlee v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  4. Heffner v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  5. Witort v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API