Wimperis v. Saltzinger
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
After verdict in defendant’s favor, the trial court denied plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial. They appeal from that order and from the judgment.
On December 10, 1961, at about 7 p. m., a rear-end collision occurred between a Ford vanette truck operated by plaintiff Harold Wimperis and a Dodge automobile operated by defendant, Siegfried Satzinger. The collision occurred near the intersection of Highways No. 100 and No. 169. Plaintiff Hazel Wimperis was a passenger in the truck driven by her husband. At the time of the accident it was dark, the temperature was about 10…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Ryan v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Pluwak v. LindbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Hardy v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Teas v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Connaker v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Rehnke v. JammesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Gave v. PYROFAX GAS CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Tomforde v. NewmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Brager v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of FargoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.