Legal Opinion

Tomforde v. Newman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 1976No. 46010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, Patricia A. Tomforde, appeals from judgment for defendant, C. R. Newman, entered pursuant to the order of the district court and in accordance with a special jury verdict. On appeal she argues that the district court erred in not granting her motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and iii instructing the jury as to defendant’s theory of defense and the emergency rule. We affirm.

Plaintiff was injured when the vehicle in which she was a passenger, owned and driven by Steven Morrow, was struck from behind, while stopped for traffic, by a vehicle owned and driven by defendant.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Simon v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Minder v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Trudeau v. Sina Contracting Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Holten v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Wimperis v. SaltzingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nelson v. HenningCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Sabasko v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API