Legal Opinion

Connaker v. Hart

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1966No. 39988PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sheran, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying plaintiffs’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

Plaintiff driver, who was stopped at an intersection on University Avenue about eight blocks west of the St. Paul city limits, was “rear-ended” by defendant, who had tried to stop his car but could not. The trial court determined that plaintiff was free from contributory negligence as a matter of law and submitted to the jury for its consideration the issues of defendant’s negligence, proximate cause, and damages. The jury found defendant not negligent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hardy v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Kuether v. LockeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Souden v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Wimperis v. SaltzingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. Whelan Ex Rel. Whelan v. GouldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tibbetts v. NybergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Grorud v. ThomassonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Rehnke v. JammesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Anderson v. RumseyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Langseth v. BaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API