Legal Opinion
Rehnke v. Jammes
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 29, 1969No. 41196PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
Plaintiff has recovered damages for personal injuries sustained when his automobile was struck from the rear by defendant Harold M. Jam-mes. On appeal, defendants assign as error: (1) Granting plaintiff a directed verdict on the issue of liability; and (2) permitting the jury to award damages for permanent injury.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to defendants, it was Jammes’ version of the accident that on January 13, 1964, at 8 a. m., he was driving an automobile owned by his employer, defendant Mohawk Rubber Company, in an easterly direction on West Broadway at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carpenter v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Kundiger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Haugen v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- McClain v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Tibbetts v. NybergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Williams v. PattersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Hawkinson v. GeyerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Williams v. Lucy Webb Hayes National Training School for Deaconesses & MissionariesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Bymark v. EnglertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Edwards v. EngenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970