Legal Opinion
Royal Brush Mfg., Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 1, 2020No. 19-00198PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Slip Op. 20- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ROYAL BRUSH MANUFACTURING, INC., Plaintiff, v. Before: Mark A. Barnett, Judge UNITED STATES, Court No. 19-00198 Defendant, and DIXON TICONDEROGA CO., Defendant-Intervenor. OPINION AND ORDER [Remanding U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s affirmative determination as to evasion in EAPA Case No. 7238.] Dated: December 1, 2020 Ronald A. Oleynik, Holland & Knight LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for Plaintiff. With him on the brief were Antonia I. Tzinova, Liliana V. Farfan, and Dariya V. Golubkova. Ashley Akers, Trial Attorney, Commercial…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goodluck India Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
- CEK Group LLC v. United StatesPublic version: 05/02/2023.United States Court of International Trade · 2023
- Far East Am., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023