Legal Opinion
Maverick Tube Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 30, 2017No. 2016-1649, 2016-1656, 2016-1689PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. and Borusan Istikbal Ticaret (together, “Borusan”) appeal from the final judgment of the Court of International Trade (“the Trade Court”) sustaining the determination of the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) on remand to apply adverse facts available (“AFA”) after Borusan did not report input purchases for two of its steel mills. See Maverick Tube Corp. v. United States, No. 14-00229, 2016 WL 703575 (Ct. Int’l Trade Feb. 22, 2016) (“Borusan II”); Final Results of Remand Determination, Maverick Tube Corp. v. United…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- F.lli De Cecco di Filippo Fara S. Martino S.p.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Essar Steel Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Nan Ya Plastics Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Hung Vuong Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Posco v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Shandong Rongxin Import & Export Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Dillinger France S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Özdemir Boru San. Ve Tic. Ltd. Sti. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.