Legal Opinion

Gaymon v. Richland Memorial Hospital

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 21, 1997No. 24648PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice:

This appeal involves the sole issue whether a claim of equitable estoppel raised as a defense in an action at law should be tried by the jury or the court. The trial judge ruled respondents were entitled to a jury trial on this claim. We reverse.

FACTS

Respondents commenced these slip and fall cases against appellant (Hospital). Hospital asserted the statute of limitations as an affirmative defense in each action and moved for summary judgment on this ground. The trial judge denied summary judgment finding respondents had raised issues of fact regarding whether Hospital was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Atlas Food Systems & Services, Inc. v. Crane National Vendors Division of Unidynamics Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Dillon County School District Number Two v. Lewis Sheet Metal Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Floyd v. FloydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Vines v. Self Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Atlantic & Charlotte Air Line Ry. Co. v. Victor Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maher v. Tietex Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  2. DiPietro v. Sipex Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  3. Black v. Lexington School District No. 2Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Rushing v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Holy Loch Distributors, Inc. v. HitchcockCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API