Legal Opinion
Rushing v. McKinney
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided July 31, 2006No. 4142PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, J.
J. Carroll Rushing brought suit against Larry A. McKinney, Ivan Block, Jeffrey J. Weiss, and Pentaura Ltd., Inc. (collectively Respondents) asserting breach of contract, fraudulent inducement, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of good faith and fair dealing, breach of fiduciary duty, promissory estoppel, and equitable estoppel arising out of the operation of Pentaura. After a bench trial, the trial court entered a verdict in favor of Respondents, and Rushing appeals. 1 We affirm.
FACTS
Pentaura was a business incorporated on October 16, 1995, by McKinney, Block, and Weiss to design,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Regions Bank v. SchmauchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Future Group, II v. NationsbankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Janasik v. Fairway Oaks Villas Horizontal Property RegimeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Southern Development Land & Golf Co. v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hardaway Concrete Co. v. Hall Contracting Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- Barnes v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
- Mazloom v. MazloomCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- Ballard v. Thoennes (In re Thoennes)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- Craft v. South Carolina Commission for BlindCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.