Legal Opinion
United States v. Gold Mountain Coffee, Ltd.
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 16, 1984No. Court 84-4-00858PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
RESTANI, Judge.
Plaintiff filed a cause of action under 18 U.S.C. § 545 (1982) and § 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (1982), alleging that defendants improperly labeled coffee imported from Indonesia as coming from China. Plaintiff seeks both a penalty equal to the value of the improperly labeled coffee (alleged to be $4,961,673) and a forfeiture of the goods.
This case is before the court on defendants’ motion to quash plaintiff’s amended warrant for arrest of property. Previous to issuance of the arrest warrant, the Customs Service and defendants…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Gold Mountain Coffee, Ltd.United States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Old Republic Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- R.J.F. Fabrics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- International Maven, Inc. v. McCauleyUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Ammex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.