Legal Opinion
Old Republic Insurance v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 11, 1990No. 83-10-01525PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DiCARLO, Judge:
Old Republic Insurance Co. moves pursuant to Rule 68(a) of the Rules of this Court for attorneys fees and other expenses against American Air Parcel (AAP). AAP cross-moves to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Subsequent to filing its motion under Rule 68(a), Old Republic moved pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631 to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
The Court finds that Old Republic has not met its burden of establishing jurisdiction. The motion for attorney’s fees and expenses and the motion to transfer are denied. The motion…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Earnest v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Autoalliance International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Bhullar v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Tembec, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- XL Specialty Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.