Legal Opinion
Ammex, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 22, 2002No. Slip. Op. 02-20; Court 99-01-00013PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACH, Judge.
I
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Plaintiff, Ammex, Inc. (“Ammex”), moves this court for an Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Should Not be Held in Contempt, pursuant to Rules 7(e) and 63 of the Rules of this Court. Specifically, Ammex seeks to require defendant, the United States of America (the “Government”), to explain why Customs’ revocation of Ammex’s authorization to sell duty-free fuel is not in contempt of this court’s order and judgment of August 25, 2000. Ammex, Inc.’s Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Should Not be Held in Contempt (“Ammex’s Motion”) at 1.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Glaxo, Inc., and Glaxo Group Limited v. Novopharm, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Hyman v. RegensteinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Jane Roe v. Operation RescueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Preemption Devices, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- United States v. The Hanover Insurance Co., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ammex, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Michael A. Cox, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Ammex, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Ammex, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Yancheng Baolong Biochemical Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Ammex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.