Legal Opinion

Slater v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 26, 2017No. 1203369, 1200682; A156512Published

1Opinion of the Court

FLYNN, J. pro tempore

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board (board) order that upheld SAIF’s denial of claimant’s previously accepted combined condition of the left knee and upheld SAIF’s medical services denial of a diagnostic MRI for claimant’s left knee. Claimant contends that SAIF failed to meet its burden to prove that claimant suffers from a qualifying preexisting condition that became the major contributing cause of claimant’s combined condition. Claimant alternatively contends that the board applied the wrong legal standard when it required claimant to prove that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Brown v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Hopkins v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. SAIF Corp. v. SpragueOregon Supreme Court · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API